What's New — Week of 1 June 2026

A busy week, with three larger pieces of work landing. The headline changes are a much-improved way to track distributions across your site, a new home for everything to do with reviews, and the next step in the standards library.

See every distribution in one place

Until now, if you wanted to check who had acknowledged a document, form, or risk assessment, you had to go into each module separately and piece the picture together yourself. That made it easy to lose track of an outstanding acknowledgement until it became a problem.

There's now a single Distributions page under Insights that brings documents, risks, and forms together in one view. Everything is grouped by status, so the items that need attention sit at the top, with in-progress and completed distributions below. If you work across more than one module, a filter lets you narrow the list down, and you can start a new distribution straight from the page.

Distributions page under Insights with items grouped by status, summary figures, and expandable rows

The distribution lists themselves have also had a redesign. Rather than a flat list of cards, distributions are now grouped by the document, form, or risk assessment they relate to, with summary figures at the top and expandable rows so you can drill into individual recipients and their acknowledgement status. You can also cancel a distribution directly from the list when you no longer need it. Larger lists now load noticeably faster too, as recipient detail is only fetched when you expand a row.

A clearer view of reviews

Reviews have been given a proper home. There's a new Reviews section under Insights that pulls documents and risk assessments together into one place, grouped by whether they're overdue, due soon, or scheduled, with summary figures and the ability to filter by module. There are equivalent Reviews pages within Documents and Risks for a module-specific view.

Reviews page under Insights with overdue, due soon, and scheduled groupings and module filters

On individual documents and risk assessments, the Reviews tab has been redesigned around a schedule card. This shows a countdown to the next review, the assigned policy and reviewers, and a full history of past reviews, all in one place. You can also record an ad-hoc review when you need to. The Approvals tab has had the same treatment: the active workflow is shown as a clear stage-by-stage view, with full approval history below.

Approvals tab showing the current approval workflow stages and approval history

Alongside this, we've changed how the first review date is calculated. Previously the review clock started whenever a policy happened to be assigned, which could be arbitrary. Now it starts from the date content is first published, so the schedule is predictable and meaningful: the review clock starts when something goes live, not when an administrator happened to configure it. For published content that hasn't yet been reviewed, you can also set a custom next review date and reset it back to the automatic schedule at any time.

Building out the standards library

The standards module has continued to grow. ISO 9001:2015 and ISO/IEC 27001:2022 are both now available as ready-made standards in the library, including the full set of Annex A controls for 27001, so you can adopt them and start tracking compliance without building the framework yourself.

For organisations that want to go further, you can now author your own standards from the library: create or duplicate a definition, build out its requirements, roles, and evidence expectations, and publish it for your sites to adopt. Parent organisations can set whether a standard is recommended, hidden, or mandatory for each child site, and sites already on an older version of a standard can upgrade to a newer one through a guided wizard that shows what's changed.

We've also made evidence more flexible. Many requirements now let you choose how to satisfy them at the point of linking evidence, whether that's by distributing a document, uploading a file, or recording a manual confirmation, rather than fixing the method up front.